Ferrari je napisao/la:Objašnjenje FIA-e...

So if, in the FIA's view, the changes made to the toe angle were altering the suspension of the car, then that would be outlawed.

However, the FIA's view is that the Mercedes system is deemed not to be altering the suspension. Instead, in its view, DAS is simply another way of 'steering' the front wheels.

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/fia- ... 14/?nrt=54

The Scuderia, on the other hand, did not plan to search for performance, because in the work plans there was only and exclusively the discovery of the car. No timing, even if Vettel resorted to a C4 train, while Charles did not go beyond C3. And in the end, the two were separated by just 181 thousandths of a second.

But this was not the unit of measurement of the technicians who, on the other hand, want to probe the different set-up adjustments before deliberating a basic set up. Charles completed his day and a half with several pit stops, even quite long ones, which allowed him to finish only 49 laps.

No mechanical problems, but only long interventions, especially on the rear suspension. And in the incessant assembly and disassembly, the Monegasque gave the feeling of being a little lost, despite the notebook. When you are forced to go slowly, you can lose your compass (Ferrari runs with lots of petrol and very often without opening the movable wing on the straight).

Leclerc is an instinctive driver who needs performance to measure the value of a car, and in this first session, he was 'kept at bay' by the team like a dog on a leash.

Sebastian's arrival in the early afternoon (the German has completely recovered from yesterday's malaise) has allowed a more analytical approach to the little fun analysis work of the SF1000. The times have obviously not changed, but the feedback from the technicians has allowed a faster understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the machine.
Vettel confirmed that he felt more aerodynamic load, confirming that the Rossa should have taken the right path to overcome the problems in the slow of the SF90 last year, but who saw the German engaged on the track could not help but observe the evident understeer of the SF1000 which, even today, was clearly the slowest in the maximum speeds.

Not satisfied, but certainly not worried. Perhaps there is regret that the overturned test plan for Vettel's malaise may have slowed down some feedback about the overall feeling of a car.

Which Ferrari should we expect? It does not have a narrow muzzle, nor a raised front suspension. It does not have the notorious DAS (Helmut Marko has already thundered that it is illegal and must be removed), but it seems to have a better base than last year. Will it be enough to give silver arrows a hard time? It's hard to say because there is also a very fit Red Bull not to be overlooked in a game that promises to be three.

Maranello's team covers themselves: does it hide fears (drag and understeer) or does it make a clever tactic? Let's not expect an answer tomorrow on the last day of the first round. The cards will be seen next week. When there is no more time to play hide and seek, but the claws will have to be pulled out. And then Leclerc will also be ready to give his paw ...

"I have stopped typing my impressions on the tablet. I had to scroll through them too long in the evening. So that is why I returned to pen and paper. We do so many laps, so writing everything down helps me to remember."

Ferrari je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 09:23 Ne znam...ja sam mišljenja da DAS neće ipak donijeti toliko prednosti...mislim da je marginalno (sve se računa u F1) i da nije vrijedno kopiranja ove godine.

Gilles je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 10:10

Ferrari je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 09:23 Ne znam...ja sam mišljenja da DAS neće ipak donijeti toliko prednosti...mislim da je marginalno (sve se računa u F1) i da nije vrijedno kopiranja ove godine.

Ja sam slicnog misljenja, da ovaj sistem nije "srebrni metak" i da moze u nekim trenucima zadati vise stete nego koristi, mislim na preagresivnu voznju preko rubnika ili recimo izletanju i udesima gde bi vozac mogao i da nastavi a ovde ce mozda nesto puci, samo nagadjam. Mislim da je ovo jedan od onih stvari, trikova gde madjionicar sve vreme mase crvenom maramicom a iza ledja asistent mu pakuje zeca u rukav.

Meni iskreno smeta da se ovako nesto radikalno kroz par sati proglasava legalnim bez bilo kakvog pritiska drugih ekipa jer je ovo itekako u sivoj zoni jer sigurno se ovom promenom ugla tockova menja i visina bolida neka je to i za milimetar ipak se menja i to nije dozvoljeno, i dolazimo ponovo do onog, pa dobro "malo je ilegalno".

Har Kl je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 10:19

Gilles je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 10:10

Ferrari je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 09:23 Ne znam...ja sam mišljenja da DAS neće ipak donijeti toliko prednosti...mislim da je marginalno (sve se računa u F1) i da nije vrijedno kopiranja ove godine.

Ja sam slicnog misljenja, da ovaj sistem nije "srebrni metak" i da moze u nekim trenucima zadati vise stete nego koristi, mislim na preagresivnu voznju preko rubnika ili recimo izletanju i udesima gde bi vozac mogao i da nastavi a ovde ce mozda nesto puci, samo nagadjam. Mislim da je ovo jedan od onih stvari, trikova gde madjionicar sve vreme mase crvenom maramicom a iza ledja asistent mu pakuje zeca u rukav.

Meni iskreno smeta da se ovako nesto radikalno kroz par sati proglasava legalnim bez bilo kakvog pritiska drugih ekipa jer je ovo itekako u sivoj zoni jer sigurno se ovom promenom ugla tockova menja i visina bolida neka je to i za milimetar ipak se menja i to nije dozvoljeno, i dolazimo ponovo do onog, pa dobro "malo je ilegalno".

1. bold Nije uopšte u sivoj zoni.
2. bold Otkud ti taj podatak?
3. bold Ne postoji taj termin. Malo ilegalno je ilegalno

Gilles je napisao/la: 21.02.2020., 10:26 1. Nisam pominjao bolid vec sam sistem.
2. Tockovi nisu idealni valjci, vec su zaobljeni i postavljeni pod nekim uglom prema postavkama samog prednjeg vesanja.
3. Pokojni Charlie W. (ili neko iz FIA-e) je upotrebio taj izraz objasnjavajuci legalnost mercedesovih felni koje su dobile zeleno svetlo.